The imprecision of measuring activated clotting time (ACT) from the guiding catheter during percutaneous coronary interventions.

BACKGROUND: Finding the balance between the reduction in ischemic events and bleeding complications is crucial for the success of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The activated clotting time (ACT) is used routinely worldwide to monitor and titrate anticoagulation therapy with unfractionated heparin (UFH) during the procedure. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to test the accuracy of ACT measurements from the guiding catheter compared to the arterial access sheath. METHODS: Patients undergoing PCI with UFH therapy were prospectively enrolled. Blood samples were drawn from the coronary guide catheter and the arterial access sheath. ACT values were determined in the same ACT machine, and potential interactions with clinical variables were analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 331 patients with post PCI ACT measurements. The mean ACT value of the catheter samples was statistically higher than the arterial access sample [294 ± 77 s Vs. 250 ± 60 s, p < 0.001]. The mean difference between the guiding catheter and the arterial line sheath samples was 43 ± 27 s (P < 0.001). We found that in 101/331 [30 %] patients the ACT from the guiding catheter was above 250 s, while from the access sheath it was below 250 s. Notably, in 40/331 [12 %] the ACT from the guiding catheter was above 200 s, while from the access sheath it was below 200 s. CONCLUSIONS: Large proportion of patient may be considered to have therapeutic ACT if measured from guide catheter during PCI, while the corresponding ACT from arterial sheath is subtherapeutic. This difference may have clinical and safety significance.

Clinical Use of CathPCI Registry Risk Score and Its Validation to Predict Long-Term Mortality.

Risk models to estimate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) mortality have limited value in complex high-risk patients. However, it was improved by a recently developed bedside model to predict in-hospital mortality using data from the American College of Cardiology CathPCI Registry that included 706,263 patients. The median risk-standardized in-hospital mortality rate was 1.9%. In an attempt to validate this model in patients admitted because of acute coronary ischemia to predict in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality, we applied the proposed risk score to the study population of the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS). This study was conducted for 2 months in 2018 and included all patients admitted to 25 coronary care units and cardiology departments in Israel. The ACSIS included 1,155 patients admitted because of acute myocardial infarction and who underwent PCI. In-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality were 2.3%, 3.1%, and 6.2%, respectively. The CathPCI risk score yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94 to 0.99) for in-hospital mortality; 0.96 (95% CI 0.94 to 0.98) for the 30-day mortality, and 0.88 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.93) for the 1-year mortality. The current model also included frail patients, and those with aortic stenosis, refractory shock, and after cardiac arrest. In conclusion, the CathPCI Registry risk score was validated using data from the ACSIS. Because the ACSIS population comprised patients with acute ischemia including those with high-risk features this model demonstrates a wider scope of application compared with previous ones. In addition, the model seems to be suitable to predict also the 30-day and 1-year mortality.

Predictors, Outcomes and Impact of Mechanical Circulatory Support of Patients With Mechanical Complications After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Despite early and currently effective epicardial coronary recanalization, the mortality rate after mechanical complication (MC) remains high, especially in cardiogenic shock. There is an increase in the use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock and MC, however, evidence is still scarce and most studies exclude patients with mechanical complications. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2015 to 2018 to identify patients with AMI, we aimed to determine the predictors and outcomes of patients with MC, subtypes and the use of MCS. RESULTS: We identified 2,427,315 patients with AMI; 2345 (0.1 %) developed MC and of them 1320 (56.3 %) received MCS. Regarding subtypes, 960 (40.9 %) had ventricular septal rupture (VSR), 540 (23.0 %) papillary muscle rupture (PMR), 530 (22.6 %) pseudoaneurysm, and 315 (13.4 %) free wall rupture (FWR). Mortality was 12 times higher (OR: 11.663, CI: 10.582-12.855, p < 0.001) in patients with MC compared to patients without MC (49.7 % vs. 4.6 %, p < 0.001) and all subtypes of MC showed a significant increase in mortality. The use of MCS was associated with decreased mortality in PMR (46.2 % to 34.8 %, p = 0.009) and pseudoaneurysm (64.7 % to 42.1 %, p < 0.001), however, with higher mortality in VSR. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of MC after an AMI is very low, nonetheless the in-hospital mortality rate remains very high. It tends to occur more in older patients and with fewer comorbidities. The subtype with the highest frequency and highest mortality was VSR. The use of mechanical circulatory support was associated with better survival in PMR and pseudoaneurysm, but not overall survival.

Impact of multisite artery disease on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: an analysis from the e-Ultimaster registry.

BACKGROUND: Multisite artery disease is considered a 'malignant' type of atherosclerotic disease associated with an increased cardiovascular risk, but the impact of multisite artery disease on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the large, prospective e-Ultimaster study were grouped into (1) those without known prior vascular disease, (2) those with known single-territory vascular disease, and (3) those with known two to three territories (i.e coronary, cerebrovascular, or peripheral) vascular disease (multisite artery disease). The primary outcome was coronary target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 1-year. Inverse propensity score weighted (IPSW) analysis was performed to address differences in baseline patient and lesion characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 37 198 patients included in the study, 62.3% had no prior known vascular disease, 32.6% had single-territory vascular disease, and 5.1% had multisite artery disease. Patients with known vascular disease were older and were more likely to be men and to have more co-morbidities. After IPSW, the TLF rate incrementally increased with the number of diseased vascular beds (3.16%, 4.44%, and 6.42% for no, single, and multisite artery disease, respectively, P < 0.01 for all comparisons). This was also true for all-cause death (2.22%, 3.28%, and 5.29%, P < 0.01 for all comparisons) and cardiac mortality (1.26%, 1.91%, and 3.62%, P ≤ 0.01 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with previously known vascular disease experienced an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events and mortality post-PCI. This risk is highest among patients with multisite artery disease.Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02188355.

Risk of ionizing radiation in pregnancy: just a myth or a real concern?

There are natural concerns regarding the risks posed to the foetus by ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy. Therefore, many female physicians select to avoid working in an environment associated with ionizing radiation exposure like the catheterization laboratory and even exclude training as electrophysiology, interventional cardiologists, or radiologists. For those already working in this field, pregnancy involves usually a 1-year interruption (pregnancy and maternity leave) to their careers, leading at times to delays in the decision to become pregnant. This review describes the low added risk of malformation/cancer in the offspring, highlight gaps in our understanding, discuss several common wrong beliefs, and recommend how to further decrease radiation dose, especially during pregnancy.

Prognosis of PCI in AMI setting in the elderly population: Outcomes from the multicenter prospective e-ULTIMASTER registry.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are usually excluded from major trials. HYOPTHESIS: This study sought to assess 1-year clinical outcomes following PCI with a drug-eluting stent in patients older than 80 years old with STEMI. METHODS: The large all-comer, multicontinental e-ULTIMASTER registry included 7507 patients with STEMI who underwent PCI using the Ultimaster stent. The primary clinical endpoint was 1-year target lesion failure, a composite of cardiac death (CD), target vessel-related myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). RESULTS: There were 457 (6.1%) patients in the elderly group (≥80 years old) that were compared to 7050 (93.9%) patients <80 years. The elderly patients included more female patients and had significantly more comorbidities and had more complex coronary anatomy. The primary endpoint occurred in 7.2% of the elderly, compared to 3.1% of the younger group (p < .001). All-cause mortality was significantly higher among the elderly group compared to the younger group (10.1% vs. 2.3%, p < .0001), as well as CD (6.1% vs. 1.6%, p < .0001), but not TV-MI (1.1% vs. 0.7%, p = .34) or CD-TLR (1.1% vs. 1.4%, p = .63). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with STEMI presentation had a higher incidence of the composite endpoint than younger patients. All-cause and CD were higher for elderly patients compared to patients younger than 80 years old. However, there was no difference in the incidence of TV-MI or target lesion revascularizations. These findings suggest that PCI for STEMI in elderly patients is relatively safe.

Impact of peripheral artery disease on prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: Outcomes from the multicenter prospective e-ULTIMASTER registry.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) represent a high risk group, and have an increased risk of cardiovascular events and worse cardiovascular outcomes. Our aim was to study the impact of PAD among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a newer-generation thin-strut DES. METHODS: In this analysis of the e-ULTIMASTER registry, patients with and without known PAD undergoing PCI were compared. A propensity-score was used to adjust for differences between the groups. The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF): a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel related myocardial infarction, and/or clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Of 33,880 patients included in the analysis, PAD was present in 2255 (6.7%). Patients with PAD were older (69.0 ± 10.0 vs. 63.8 ± 11.3 years) with a higher burden of comorbidities. Patients with PAD were less likely to present with STEMI (9.6% vs. 21%), and more likely to undergo complex PCI (left main 5.5% vs. 3.0% ostial lesions 10.4% vs. 7.0%, bifurcations 14.5% vs. 12.3% and calcification 26.8% vs. 17.8%). PAD was found to be independently associated with 41% increased risk for TLF. The risk for all cause death and for cardiac death was 75% and 103% higher, respectably. No difference was found in the rates of stent thrombosis, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, or myocardial infarction (MI). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PAD are at higher risk for (cardiac) death post PCI, but not target vessel or lesion repeat revascularizations. The PAD cohort represents a population with a higher risk clinical profile. Further research combining medical and device therapies is needed to further improve the outcomes in this high-risk population.

Impact of the Admission Pathway on the Gender-Related Mortality of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

The mortality of women with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) exceeds that of men, supposedly the result of older age and co-morbidities. Patients with STEMI can be transported directly to the catherization lab by the emergency medical service (EMS) or to the emergency department (ED) by the EMS, a regular ambulance, or independently. This raises the question whether gender disparity in the transport of patients with STEMI may affect time to therapy and consequently explain the disparate outcome in men and women with STEMI. We analyzed a large nationwide registry of prospectively-recorded patients with acute coronary syndromes in order to determine if there is a survival gap between men and women with STEMI, and to assess the gender-related effect of admission pathway on time intervals and 5-year mortality. Study population included 2,740 patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary interventions, comprising 464 women (17%, median-70 years) and 2,276 men (83%, median-58 years). The unadjusted 5-year mortality of women was higher compared with men (26.4% vs 15.6%, p = 0.001) but adjustment abrogated this survival difference. Regardless of adjustment, the 5-year mortality of patients with STEMI admitted directly to the catherization lab or to the ED by EMS was similar for men and women but significantly lower in the directly admitted patients (p <0.028). In contrast, admission to the ED by non-EMS was associated with markedly worse survival among women. These results indicate that women suspected of STEMI benefit from transportation by the EMS and should use this pathway exclusively to reach the hospital.

Can Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Be Performed at Institutions Without On-Site Cardiac Surgery Departments?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI] represents a paradigm shift in therapeutic options for patients with severe aortic stenosis [AS]. In less than 20 years, TAVI has rapidly disseminated to include a significant proportion of AS patients. The number of AS patients needing TAVI is expected to further increase. Since there is a limited number of centers performing TAVI, wait times are expected to increase. This might have a critical impact of AS patient life as mortality rate of AS patients awaiting TAVI, is substantial, ranging from 2 to 10%. With time, as more patients were treated, improved experience, better imaging and devices, this technology became safer with more reliable results. Today most TAVI complications are related to vascular access [4-6%] and there is less need for emergency thoracic bail out [0.2-0.5%]. In this review, we summarize the prognosis while waiting, the outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI at institutions without on-site cardiac surgery departments and the data describing rates and outcomes of TAVI patients requiring treatment of intra-procedural life-threatening complications. Similar to coronary interventions in the past, TAVI should be considered also in centers without on-site cardiac surgery departments under certain conditions such as, experienced operators, heart team discussion, well established imaging modalities, skilled and qualified support personal, and adequate pre- and post-care facility.

Differentiation between myopericarditis and acute myocardial infarction on presentation in the emergency department using the admission C-reactive protein to troponin ratio.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of myopericarditis is different than that of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, since their clinical presentation is frequently similar it may be difficult to distinguish between these entities despite a disparate underlying pathogenesis. Myopericarditis is primarily an inflammatory disease associated with high C-reactive protein (CRP) and relatively low elevated troponin concentrations, while AMI is characterized by the opposite. We hypothesized that evaluation of the CRP/troponin ratio on presentation to the emergency department could improve the differentiation between these two related clinical entities whose therapy is different. Such differentiation should facilitate triage to appropriate and expeditious therapy. METHODS: We evaluated the CRP/troponin ratio on presentation among patients consecutively included in a large single center registry that included 1898 consecutive patients comprising 1025 ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, 518 Non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients, and 355 patients diagnosed on discharge as myopericarditis. CRP and troponin were sampled on admission in all patients and their ratio was assessed against discharge diagnosis. ROC analysis of the CRP/troponin ratios evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of myopericarditis against all AMI, STEMI, and NSTEMI patients. RESULTS: Median admission CRP/troponin ratios were 84, 65, and 436 mg×ml/liter×ng in STEMI, NSTEMI and myopericarditis groups, respectively (p<0.001) demonstrating good differentiating capability. The Receiver-operator-curve of admission CRP/troponin ratio for diagnosis of myopericarditis against all AMI, STEMI, and NSTEMI patients yielded an area-under-the curve of 0.74, 0.73, and 0.765, respectively. CRP/troponin ratio>500 resulted in specificity exceeding 85%, and for a ratio>1000, specificity>92%. CONCLUSION: The CRP/troponin ratio can serve as an effective tool to differentiate between myopericarditis and AMI. In the appropriate clinical context, the CRP/troponin ratio may preclude further evaluation.

The impact of lockdown enforcement during the SARSCoV-2 pandemic on the timing of presentation and early outcomes of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

INTRODUCTION: Early reports described decreased admissions for acute cardiovascular events during the SarsCoV-2 pandemic. We aimed to explore whether the lockdown enforced during the SARSCoV-2 pandemic in Israel impacted the characteristics of presentation, reperfusion times, and early outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. METHODS: A multicenter prospective cohort comprising all STEMI patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention admitted to four high-volume cardiac centers in Israel during lockdown (20/3/2020-30/4/2020). STEMI patients treated during the same period in 2019 served as controls. RESULTS: The study comprised 243 patients, 107 during the lockdown period of 2020 and 136 during the same period in 2019, with no difference in demographics and clinical characteristics. Patients admitted in 2020 had higher admission and peak troponin levels, had a 2.4 fold greater likelihood of Door-to-balloon times> 90 min (95%CI: 1.2-4.9, p = 0.01) and 3.3 fold greater likelihood of pain-to-balloon times> 12 hours (OR 3.3, 95%CI: 1.3-8.1, p<0.01). They experienced higher rates hemodynamic instability (25.2% vs 14.7%, p = 0.04), longer hospital stay (median, IQR [4, 3-6 Vs 5, 4-6, p = 0.03]), and fewer early (<72 hours) discharge (12.4% Vs 32.4%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The lockdown imposed during the SARSCoV-2 pandemic was associated with a significant lag in the time to reperfusion of STEMI patients. Measures to improves this metric should be implemented during future lockdowns.

Modern Stents: Where Are We Going?

Coronary artery stenting is the treatment of choice for patients requiring coronary angioplasty. We describe the major advancements with this technology. There have been significant developments in the design of stents and adjunctive medical therapies. Newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have almost negligible restenosis rates and, when combined with proper anti-platelet treatment and optimal deployment, a low risk of stent thrombosis. The introduction of newer-generation DES with thinner stent struts, novel durable or biodegradable polymer coatings, and new antiproliferative agents has further improved the safety profile of early-generation DES. In parallel the effectiveness has been kept, with a significant reduction in the risk of target lesion revascularization compared with the early-generation DES. However, to date, the development of completely bioresorbable vascular scaffolds has failed to achieve further clinical benefits and has been associated with increased thrombosis. Newer-generation DES-including both durable polymer as well as biodegradable polymer-have become the standard of care in all patient and lesion subsets, with excellent long-term results.

Proximal Left Anterior Descending Artery Treatment Using a Bioresorbable Polymer Coating Sirolimus-Eluting Stent: Real-World Outcomes From the Multicenter Prospective e-Ultimaster Registry.

Background Guidelines recommend heart team discussion and coronary artery bypass graft consideration in patients with proximal left anterior descending (LAD) artery stenosis. Evidence suggests that outcomes of proximal LAD angioplasty might not differ from treatment of nonproximal LAD locations. We aim to determine clinical outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the proximal LAD segment in comparison with nonproximal LAD angioplasty, using a thin-strut drug-eluting stent. Methods and Results In this analysis of the e-Ultimaster registry, patients undergoing angioplasty in the proximal LAD territory were compared with those treated in nonproximal LAD locations. Multivariate analysis and propensity score were used to adjust for differences among the groups. The primary outcome was target lesion failure: a composite of cardiac death, target-lesion-related myocardial infarction, and/or clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up. Of the 17 805 patients (mean age, 64.2±11; 76% male), 5452 (30.6%) underwent proximal LAD and 12 353 (69.4%) nonproximal LAD percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients in the proximal LAD group had more multivessel disease (48.7% versus 43.5%; P<0.001) and 2-fold more bifurcations lesions (18.8% versus 9.2%; P<0.0001). After propensity-weighted adjustment, target lesion failure did not differ between the groups (3.3% versus 2.9%; P=0.17 for proximal LAD versus nonproximal LAD angioplasty, respectively). In multivariate analysis, proximal LAD treatment was not an independent predictor of target lesion failure (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88-1.31; P=0.48). Conclusions At 1-year follow-up, patients had similar clinical outcomes independent of stenting location, questioning whether proximal LAD treatment should be regarded differently from stenting in any other coronary artery territory.

Massive Gastrointestinal Bleeding from a Jejunal Dieulafoy Lesion: An Extraordinary Presentation.

We present an atypical and rare case of a previously healthy 27-year-old male who presented with acute onset of abdominal pain, bloody diarrhea, and syncope. At the Emergency Department, vital signs were stable with no signs of shock. Physical examination revealed diffuse tenderness of the abdomen and cherry red blood was noted upon rectal examination. Blood tests showed marked leukocytosis without anemia. Sigmoidoscopy was performed which revealed hematochezia with no obvious site of bleeding. The patient was admitted to the hospital with a working diagnosis of dysentery and received supportive care. During the following days, blood tests revealed an ongoing decline of hemoglobin levels which necessitated a new workup of gastrointestinal bleeding. Investigation modalities including upper and lower endoscopies as well as angiography failed to demonstrate a bleeding site. Scintigraphy, which was performed next, demonstrated an increased radiotracer activity in the right abdomen consistent with small bowel bleeding. Following these results, the patient underwent urgent laparotomy and surgical resection was performed. The histopathological findings were consistent with a Dieulafoy lesion. This case illustrates the importance of the complementary role of various modalities in locating the bleeding site along the gastrointestinal tract.